Pacing the Frontier Trade: How Hyperliquid priced in Dario's tweet

TL;DR - we investigate the price action on @entropyIO OpenAI and Anthropic markets, as well as @tradexyz single equities and indices, both deployed permissionlessly on Hyperliquid. There was less volume on pre-IPO markets by Entropy than on longer-running markets by Trade[XYZ], but both  of these onchain venues had active participation that priced in risks which unfolded over the weekend. We dig into the wallet data to understand more about the participants and discuss why 24/7 markets are the only thing that makes sense in the modern world.

Pacing the Frontier trade

On Saturday, the 12th of September, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, posted his essay on why the AI industry should be better regulated. This piece, which probably will become historic later, was, quite obviously, market-moving. The place to react was Hyperliquid.

We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.

Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our…

— Dario Amodei (@DarioAmodei) September 12, 2026

Immediate reaction

The first reaction happened on io:ANTH and io:OAI markets. The first 5-minute candle on Anthropic was down, whereas the OpenAI perp went up, but the buying flow was quickly derisked into.

Traders starting to price the news were mostly Hyperliquid-native traders. One of them was notgonnatrickme, 0xaea8e3bd369217cc6e3e6abddf0da318fba8e59b.

At the time of writing this article, notgonnatrickme has +7.54m lifetime PNL, and his largest positions are -3.8m Anthropic short and -3m BTC short.

Notgonnatrickme already was 1361.724 ANTH short at the start of the day, which was approximately -3m notional position. He saw this news as a confirmation of his thesis and immediately added more to his existing short.

Another trader, 0x2a767954… who has -1.76m total lifetime PNL, was the largest net seller of ANTH in the first 90 minutes. They were already bearish on OAI and ANTH before the post, added mainly to ANTH afterward, then bought other assets later in the weekend.

0x891140a93b… is a trader with +200k lifetime PNL who has previously used @BasedOneX and @LiminalMoney. He was #1 OAI net seller in the next 90 minutes, selling around 115k notional of OAI. He is still holding that position.

The above examples show that the price action on Entropy markets is driven by sophisticated pro-tail and retail traders rather than institutions. There are still some capacity constraints for big capital players - which is a good thing for these smaller participants! Onchain markets still have edge to capture, especially as the world is slower to adapt to 24/7, always-on trading.

The decline in XYZ-listed markets

XYZ markets have repriced later. The move was initiated overnight, then continued on Sunday morning.

The chip selloff accelerated on Sunday morning. MU fell 1.20% in 30 minutes. SNDK's move included 1.50m of new short-opening taker sells from one wallet.

The wallet responsible for the new short-opening SNDK sells was 0x98b…, which has an incredible +22.73m lifetime PNL. Currently, they have 7.7m ETH short and 2.8m SPCX short. Their SNDK position was covered the same day.

Another broad low arrived Sunday afternoon: MU and SNDK reached their weekend lows at 13:27, NVDA at 13:33, NBIS at 13:35 — roughly 23 hours after the post, still before futures reopened.

XYZ markets went down on Sunday, and then continued to go down after the futures opened. The weekend move purely on XYZ was roughly 40–60% of the down move from Friday close to Monday open.

Conclusion — Trade[XYZ] once again provided a live venue for pricing and trading this exposure while cash equities were closed. By the futures reopen, single-stock contracts had already commenced half of the eventual selloff. It doesn't need to be said that the existence of Trade[XYZ] allows sharp traders and portfolio managers to hedge weekend risks — which sometimes can take the shape of an X post!

Entropy markets - liquidity and oracles

Entropy markets are still nascent, so the liquidity available was at times limited. OAI's shallow bids may have turned initial selling into exacerbated moves — liquidations then consumed more bids and reinforced the decline. OAI's median observed bid depth within 0.05% was 200 USDC, versus 2,691 USDC for ANTH, while liquidation notional was approximately 9.5× larger (although the cause and effect of this might be mixed).

In conclusion, we think that the move in OAI was directionally correct but exacerbated due to the available liquidity. The spread between Anthropic and OpenAI was due to cascading liquidations. OAI recorded 376k of liquidation volume across 71 wallets, and Anthropic only had 40k of liquidation volume across 9 wallets. A single wallet, 0x6754…, was responsible for 64% of OAI liquidation flow. His 250k position was liquidated on Sunday morning. The OAI book, as evidenced by the orderbook snapshots, didn't have enough liquidity to accommodate the forced flow.

ANTH briefly regained its pre-post 2,167 level before futures reopened. At Monday’s cash close, ANTH was +0.16%, OAI −3.91% versus the announcement.

The oracle design was quite robust and didn't deviate much from the traded price.

Pricing the weekend risks

By Sunday's futures reopen, Trade[XYZ] had already priced 31–62% of the decline observed by Monday's cash open. Even the futures' open would have been a gap down.

The liquidity was also there - throughout the weekend XYZ100 maintained >1m bid/ask liquidity. Of course, this liquidity is relatively small compared to quotes on TradFi exchanges, especially during US trading hours, but it is still more than enough for smaller players to fully hedge the risks.

In a world where people at the frontier of technological advancement use the same social networks as everyone else, information spreads incredibly quickly, regardless of whether it's a weekday or weekend. If trillions of dollars of CapEx and shareholder value are dependent on the development (and, possibly, regulation) of AI, not being able to price these risks on the weekend is, frankly, asinine.

Thus, Hyperliquid.

Disclaimer

This analysis is based on Hydromancer's proprietary Hyperliquid data and on the public archive at Reservoir, which is freely accessible to anyone who wants to check or reproduce the numbers. Wallet-level information is drawn from public onchain data. The research was prepared quickly, in the days following the events described, and may contain errors or omissions; all figures are as of the time of writing. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to trade any asset. Hydromancer provides data infrastructure for Hyperliquid and operates a validator on the network. This piece is not affiliated with or endorsed by Entropy, TradeXYZ, Anthropic, or OpenAI.

‍